©Shutterstock.com
Commitment to our readers
The GOBankingRates editorial team is committed to providing you with unbiased reviews and information. We use data-driven methods to evaluate financial products and services – our reviews and ratings are not influenced by advertisers. You can read more about our editorial guidelines and our review methodology for products and services.
20 years
help you get rich
trusted by
millions of readers
Many retirees find comfort in knowing that they have a will. It feels responsible. Organized. Last.
But according to senior law and estate planning experts, having a will does not equate to a good estate plan, and in some cases, an outdated or overly rigid will can actually create stress, conflict, and unnecessary costs for your loved ones.
Here are three things retirees should strongly consider removing from their will, and what to put in its place.
1. Using a will as your primary estate planning tool
One of the biggest mistakes retirees make is relying on a will as their main planning document.
“As an elder law and estate planning attorney who works with retirees daily, I see this all the time,” said Evan H. Farr, certified elder law attorney and retirement planner. Farr Law Firm.
“Many retirees believe that having a will means they are saved from chaos, when in reality, they have ensured that there will be an unnecessary court-supervised process.”
Farr said the matter is pending probate. The will must go through probate, which Farr describes as public, expensive and time-consuming. That means:
- Anyone can see the details of your property.
- Property transfer may be delayed for months or more.
- Family disputes are more likely to arise.
Living trusts, both revocable and irrevocable, avoid probate altogether. Does not make a will.
“Relying solely on a will creates privacy concerns, delays the transfer of assets, and often increases family conflict,” Farr said.
What to consider instead: A living trust can control how and when assets are distributed while keeping your assets private and reducing administrative headaches for your heirs.
2. Delivery instructions that leave no flexibility
Many wills include instructions that seem reasonable and simple on paper, such as giving children their inheritance outright at a specific age.
But that simplicity can backfire.
“Fixed age distribution weakens the ability to protect assets,” Farr said. “Once assets are transferred outright, they become vulnerable to divorce, creditors, lawsuits, poor financial decisions, and even substance abuse or mental health issues.”
In other words, what feels generous today may inadvertently put your inheritance at serious risk tomorrow.
Shawn Patrick Malloy, Founder and Managing Partner Malloy Law OfficeOne sees similar issues when retirees fail to revisit old provisions.
“A will that seemed reasonable ten or fifteen years ago may shortchange the surviving spouse or force the sale of assets that the retiree wanted to keep in the family,” he said.
He recalled a case where fixed cash gifts left heirs with no option but to sell real estate to cover expenses.
What to consider instead: Using a trust structure allows assets to be distributed gradually, conditionally or with additional protections, while respecting your intentions.
3. Old Beneficiary and Detailed Personal Asset Lists
Another common issue is not what is in the will; It is what is no longer there.
“I’ve seen wills that still left assets to an ex-spouse or a different family member,” Malloy said, even though retirement accounts and life insurance listed different beneficiaries.
This creates confusion and often leads to court battles. Assets with beneficiary designations are outside the will, but when the documents conflict, families can litigate to resolve it.
Malloy also cautions against listing detailed personal property distributions directly in a will.
“Referring names to who gets furniture, jewelery or collections can perpetuate stereotypes,” he said. “I prefer to use a separate, revocable memorandum of wishes that can be updated without rewriting the will.”
What to consider instead:
- Regularly review beneficiary designations on retirement accounts and insurance policies.
- Move personal property instructions into a separate, easily updated document.
An Important Oversight: Long-Term Care Planning
Malloy says if your goal is to make life easier for your family, eliminating some provisions may be as important as adding new provisions. So perhaps the most damaging omission is nothing written in the will. It’s totally missing something.
“Very few people consider long-term care planning when facing retirement,” Farr said. “And a will does absolutely nothing to protect the estate from nursing home or long-term care expenses.”
Even a revocable living trust offers no protection if long-term care costs arise. Farr often sees clients with carefully drafted wills whose estates were completely depleted before the will became significant.
“In terms of consequences, not planning for long-term care is often the biggest way for retirees to harm their estate planning,” he said.
What to consider instead: Options such as long-term care insurance or a Medicaid Asset Protection Trust, a specific type of irrevocable trust, can help preserve assets, depending on your situation and timing.
bottom line
A will is meant to make life easier for the people you love. But when it is outdated, inflexible or incomplete, it can do the opposite.
“Often, we best protect that goal by eliminating burdensome and outdated provisions,” Malloy said.
If you are retired, or nearing retirement, now is the time to review your will, reevaluate your comprehensive estate plan, and make sure it reflects your current reality.