Anchi/Getty Images
Commitment to our readers
The GOBankingRates editorial team is committed to providing you with unbiased reviews and information. We use data-driven methods to evaluate financial products and services – our reviews and ratings are not influenced by advertisers. You can read more about our editorial guidelines and our review methodology for products and services.
20 years
help you get rich
trusted by
millions of readers
With salary negotiations ongoing and inflation still impacting salaries, I wanted to take a reality check on what people should actually be earning in 2026.
Instead of just asking an artificial intelligence (AI), I decided to pit ChatGPIT against Google’s Gemini to see if they agreed on salary benchmarks or if they would give me completely different answers.
Turns out, both AIs had strong opinions, but they focused on different aspects of the salary question. Below is what he had to say.
Apart from this, ChatGPT also considers whether the take-home pay is being reduced or not.
Where does ChatGPIT begin: age-based benchmarks
ChatGPT jumped right into the average earnings by age group. For people ages 25 to 34, the average is about $59,800, the AI said. For ages 35 to 44, it is approximately $72,020 and for ages 45 to 54, it decreases slightly to $71,600. Who did we verify these amounts with? Investopedia Informed.
The AI has created this as a baseline to see where you stand. If you’re between 30 and 40 and earn between $60,000 and $75,000, ChatGPT said you’re close to the United States average.
Where Gemini Starts: The Living Wage Reality
Gemini took a different approach right out of the gate. Instead of just showing average earnings, it emphasized what it takes to live comfortably. AI said the average annual salary for full-time employees is about $63,795, but financial experts suggest that to live comfortably in a moderate-cost area, a person now needs about $90,000 to $105,000.
The gap between average income and comfortable living was Gemini’s initial argument. AI wanted to make it clear that average earnings do not mean that you are financially comfortable.
Both AIs agreed on one thing: 3.5% increase
This is where ChatGPT and Gemini align almost perfectly. Both said most U.S. employers are budgeting about 3.5% pay increases for 2026 — according to what they check. worldatwork.
ChatGPT explained that if you made $60,000 in 2025, a typical raise would take you to about $62,000 to $63,000 in 2026. Gemini said that if you haven’t received a raise of at least 3.5% in the last 12 months, your real purchasing power has actually decreased as inflation is running at about 3.4%.
Both AIs agreed that wage increases are modest and steady, not explosive. Unless they are changing jobs or industries, no one should expect a double-digit raise.
The big difference: How they reduced earnings by age
ChatGPT kept its age-based salary goals simple and focused on career stages. Entry-level recent graduates should expect to make $40,000 to $55,000. Early career workers with three to seven years of experience should make in the $55,000 to $70,000 range. Mid-career professionals eight to 15 years old should reach $70,000 to $90,000.
Gemini got more detailed information with specific age groups. 20 to 24 year olds should earn $42,000 to $45,000. Those ages 25 to 34 should be looking at $61,000 to $65,000. Age 35 to 44 should be $74,000 to $78,000. And ages 45 to 54 represent peak earning years of $75,000 to $80,000.
The numbers are close but not identical. Gemini’s ranges are slightly higher in most categories, which may reflect different data sources or methodology.
Education makes a big difference in Gemini’s analysis
Chatgpt barely mentions education. AI focused more on job type and industry rather than degree.
Gemini made education a key part of their development. AI said those with bachelor’s degrees averaged about $67,000 to $70,000, while master’s degree holders hit the $82,000 mark.
This is a $12,000 to $15,000 difference between bachelor’s and master’s degree holders, which Gemini considered significant enough to highlight.
High-Paying Industries: Different Focus Areas
ChatGPT omitted the names of financial managers who earned about $161,700 and noted that technology, health care and engineering positions typically pay more than $80,000. But AI didn’t go in-depth on specific industries.
Gemini devoted an entire section to high-demand industries. Tech and AI roles start at $85,000 and senior engineers often exceed $170,000. Registered Nurses in Healthcare make an average of $89,000. The average income for management and finance occupations is approximately $90,636 annually.
Gemini clearly wanted to show which industries are crushing it while which industries are killing it.
Location factor: Only Gemini went there
ChatGPT noted that the minimum wage varies by state and that some states have raised their minimum wages to $15 to $17 an hour in 2026 — according to what it checks. Paycor. But Chatgpt did not take into account the difference in cost of living.
Gemini made location a major part of its answer. In high-cost cities like San Francisco or New York, the comfortable salary for a single adult is often reported to be $130,000 or more. In low-to-moderate cost areas like Texas, Florida or Ohio, you can feel just as rich on $75,000 due to the low cost of housing and in some cases the lack of state income tax.
This was one of Gemini’s strongest points. Equal pay means completely different things depending on where you live.
household income question
ChatGPT did not mention household income at all. It stuck to personal income throughout its analysis.
Gemini said that for a standard American family, the average is currently hovering around $83,000 to $85,000. This matters because many people are trying to figure out if their family is making ends meet, not just their individual paycheck.
‘Comfortable’ border debate
ChatGPT focused on what is normal and average, not necessarily what is comfortable. The AI wanted to show you where you stand compared to other workers.
Gemini emphasizes that earning average does not mean you are comfortable. The AI kept circling back to this $90,000 to $105,000 comfort range for single people in moderate-cost areas, framing it as a realistic goal that people should aim for rather than settle for mediocrity.
Which AI was more helpful?
ChatGPT provided a clean, simple framework that was easy to digest. If you just want to know if your salary is competitive for your age and career stage, ChatGPT’s breakdown works perfectly.
Gemini provided more nuance and context, specifically location, education, and what’s really needed to live comfortably than just average earnings. If you’re trying to figure out if you’re on the right track for your goals financially, Gemini’s answer dives deep into the reality of modern costs.
The most interesting thing wasn’t that they disagreed. The point is that they emphasized different aspects of the same question. ChatGPT treats salary as a competition – where do you rank compared to others? Gemini treats salary as a tool – is your income really enough to live the life you want?
Both approaches have value, but depending on what you’re trying to find out about your earnings, one AI’s answer may be more effective than the other.