©Shutterstock.com
Commitment to our readers
The GOBankingRates editorial team is committed to providing you with unbiased reviews and information. We use data-driven methods to evaluate financial products and services – our reviews and ratings are not influenced by advertisers. You can read more about our editorial guidelines and our review methodology for products and services.
20 years
Helping you become richer
trusted by
millions of readers
Social Security claiming decisions shape retirement income for decades, but common advice ignores individual financial circumstances that determine the optimal timing.
When we asked ChatGPT about the best way to claim Social Security, she provided strategies for claiming benefits, emphasizing that waiting until age 70 maximizes lifetime payments for most people. Anthony DeLuca, a CFP and CDFA who is an expert contributor Annuity.orgReviewed the AI recommendations and identified significant shortcomings in a one-size-fits-all approach.
“It’s not surprising that people are turning to ChatGPT to answer their financial questions. I’ll be honest with you; I turn to it for validating thoughts,” DeLuca said. But he emphasized that ChatGPT is a software that doesn’t know what it doesn’t know.
ChatGPT’s main recommendations
AI has identified the key Social Security ages: 62 as the earliest claiming age, 67 as the full retirement age for many workers today and 70 when the maximum monthly benefit begins. According to the Social Security Administration, benefits increase by about 8% per year for every year after full retirement age until 70.
“Most experts agree that the strategy that maximizes lifetime benefits is often to wait as long as possible (until age 70),” Chatgpt said.
The AI provided an example showing monthly benefits: approximately $1,400 at age 62, approximately $2,000 at age 67, and approximately $2,480 at age 70.
break-even analysis
ChatGPT calculated that the break-even point between claiming at 62 versus 70 comes around age 78 to 80. According to the AI, if you live longer than this, it usually pays to wait.
AI offered general rules: Claim first if you need income immediately, have health problems shortening life expectancy or lack other retirement savings. If you’re healthy, expect to live to 80, or want the biggest lifetime benefit, delay until age 70.
Where experts agree
DeLuca confirmed that ChatGPT’s information was not false. “To a large extent I agree with that,” he said. The mathematics of increased benefits and break-even age remains within standard assumptions.
His concerns were focused elsewhere. “My biggest issue is this: ‘Most experts agree that the strategy that maximizes benefits is often to wait as long as possible (up to 70),'” DeLuca said. These are broad recommendations that do not take into account one’s specific financial planning, portfolio construction, risk management or the current economic environment.
danger of general advice
AI provides accurate general information, but cannot take into account portfolio performance expectations, tax planning opportunities, asset placement strategies or how claiming timing interacts with other retirement income sources.
Claiming 70, ChatGPT bills it as longevity insurance that offers the largest possible monthly payout and large cost of living adjustments over time. DeLuca doesn’t disagree with that characterization, but he wants people to understand that it’s one factor among many.
A client with sufficient taxable brokerage accounts, traditional IRAs facing large required minimum distributions and in good health can optimize their overall financial position by claiming early and executing a sophisticated multiyear tax strategy. ChatGPT cannot evaluate those competing priorities.
bullish market outlook
DeLuca provided a specific example where claiming early makes more sense. Consider a client who is moderately aggressive by choice or necessity to meet certain retirement goals during a bull market.
“There’s an argument then that one should withdraw their Social Security before age 70 and let their retirement assets grow in the market,” he said. His firm’s proprietary balanced models outperformed fees by 8% over the past 10 years. The S&P 500 has returned more than 14% over the past five years.
“Wouldn’t it be better for a customer to close early?” DeLuca asked. The answer depends on individual circumstances which ChatGPT cannot evaluate.
Roth conversion strategy
DeLuca offered another scenario where the conventional wisdom breaks down. What happens if a customer retires at age 62? Should they wait until age 70 and have their retirement assets largely depleted in that eight-year period?
“Maybe they should,” DeLuca said. This reason may surprise those who focus only on maximizing Social Security. If clients have significant deferred assets, the decline in income during those eight years allows a Roth conversion that significantly reduces RMDs later in life.
Claiming Social Security early in this case means higher taxable income and less opportunity for a tax-efficient Roth conversion during low-income years.
The right way to use AI
DeLuca positioned ChatGPT as a useful tool with limitations rather than something to be avoided entirely.
AI excels at explaining rules, profit calculations, and general strategies. It falls short on personalized analysis that takes account of how market conditions, tax conditions and Social Security timing interact with broader financial plans.
“Always consult a CFP®,” DeLuca said. Certified financial planners can evaluate individual circumstances in a way ChatGPT cannot reach or weigh appropriately.
The main thing is that ChatGPT’s social security advice provides a helpful starting point but it should not be the last word. The typical optimization of maximizing lifetime benefits ignores real-world complexity where claiming early may better serve broader financial goals than waiting for the maximum monthly check.