anankkml/Getty Images
quick read
-
A simple ETF mix can replicate the structure of Wellington. The combination of VIG and VTC in the 67/33 split closely mirrors Wellington’s stock-bond allocation and overall strategy.
-
Active management still adds a small edge. Wellington slightly outperformed the ETF version in both return and risk-adjusted metrics during the test period.
-
Low fees and flexibility work in ETFs’ favor. The ETF approach reduces costs, removes minimums, and gives you full control over rebalancing, even if it doesn’t exactly match Wellington’s long-term track record.
-
The analyst who called NVIDIA his top 10 AI stocks in 2010. Get them for free here.
Did you know that Vanguard has one of the oldest mutual funds still in existence? it is called Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor Shares (VWELX)And it started in 1929.
The analyst who called NVIDIA his top 10 stocks in 2010. Get them for free here.
Since then, it has survived almost every major financial shock you can think of, including the Great Depression, the hyperinflation period of the 1970s and 1980s, the dot-com crash, the 2008 financial crisis, and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Despite all this, it has delivered a very competitive 8.35% annualized total return since inception after reinvesting dividends and fees. Today, you can access the fund at a 0.24% expense ratio, though it comes with a minimum investment of $3,000. It also pays a respectable 2.22% 30-day SEC yield, making it a popular choice for balanced, income-oriented investors.
That said, much of Wellington’s “secret sauce” is based on a fairly straightforward mix of stocks and bonds. If you do this differently, you can replicate something similar using a low-cost ETF. Today’s article will try and do just that.
The idea is to decompose the Wellington into its stock and bond components, find a suitable ETF option, and see how a simple two-ETF portfolio stacks up using backtest data from testfolio.io.
Vanguard Wellington’s Stock Allocation
Vanguard Wellington allocates about two-thirds, or about 67%, of its portfolio to equities. According to Vanguard, the fund focuses on high-quality large- and mid-cap companies, often in unprofitable industries. The strategy emphasizes above-average dividend yields, reasonable valuations and improving fundamentals.
Right now, this translates into a relatively concentrated portfolio of 79 stocks, with an average earnings growth rate of 25.9%, a price-to-earnings ratio of 26.2x and a return on equity of over 30%.
If you want an ETF that reflects a similar idea, I think Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEMKT: VIG) Is a strong candidate. It tracks the S&P US Dividend Growers Index, which requires companies to have consistent dividend growth for at least 10 years. It also excludes real estate investment trusts and individual holdings are capped at 4% during each rebalancing.
The result is a broadly diversified portfolio of over 300 companies with strong profitability and consistent dividend growth. Although it is less concentrated than Wellington, it still leans towards quality. Currently, it offers a 1.66% 30-day SEC yield and trades at a similar valuation range, albeit with a more rules-based approach.
Vanguard Wellington’s bond allocation
On the fixed income side, Wellington allocates the remaining one-third of its portfolio to bonds targeting the intermediate term. Although it contains a mix of Treasuries, agency debt, and mortgage-backed securities, a large portion of it is invested in investment-grade corporate bonds rated BBB or higher.
To reiterate, composite bond ETFs can be very broad. There is a more targeted option Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (NASDAQ: VTC)Which focuses exclusively on investment-grade corporate loans.
This ETF holds approximately 5,000 bonds with an average duration of 6.6 years, placing it firmly in the intermediate range. Most of the portfolio is rated A or BBB, which matches well with Wellington’s credit profile. In exchange for taking on that credit risk, investors are currently compensated with a 5.08% 30-day SEC yield.
putting together a portfolio
To mirror Wellington’s structure, you could combine these two ETFs with a 67% allocation to VIG and a 33% allocation to VTC, rebalancing once a year. This creates a simple, rules-based version of Wellington’s balanced approach.
Using testfolio.io backtesting data over a period of 8.44 years from November 2017 to April 2026, this ETF combination returned 9.37% annualized. Over the same period, Wellington fared slightly better with 9.45%.
The risk metrics were also very close. The ETF portfolio recorded annualized volatility of 12.36%, while Wellington came in slightly lower at 12.28%. This translates into slightly lower risk adjusted returns, with a Sharpe ratio of 0.58 versus 0.59 for Wellington.
So yes, Wellington is still out of the ETF version. In some cases, a skilled manager can add incremental value over time through security selection and portfolio adjustment. That said, the ETF version comes with lower costs and more flexibility.
The Wellington fee is 0.24%, while VIG and VTC cost 0.04% and 0.03% respectively. The weighted average fees for ETF portfolios are significantly lower, and there is no minimum investment requirement.
If you can get to Wellington and are comfortable with active management, this is a solid option. But if you prefer a low-cost, transparent, and flexible option, this two-ETF combination gets you much closer using simple building blocks.
The analyst who called out NVIDIA in 2010 reveals his top 10 AI stocks
This analyst’s 2025 pick is an average of 106% higher. He revealed his top 10 stocks to buy in 2026. Get them for free here.